Brideshead Revisited 
      I confess that I have never read the celebrated novel by Evelyn Waugh.  I
        remember seeing only a few episodes of the well reguarded 1980’s
        miniseries with Jeremy Irons when it aired over 25 years ago.  So,
        while I have a sense of the story of Charles Ryder and his relationship
        with the aristocratic Flyte family in the 1920’s and 30’s,
        I certainly am no expert on the topic.  
      Be that as it may, for the most part I enjoyed the current film adaptation
        by director Julian Jarrold.   It’s certainly a stunning film
        visually, with sumptuous costumes, sets (Yorkshire’s Castle Howard
        serves as the home of Lord and Lady Marcham in both the miniseries and
        film), and beautiful photography.  The film is less successful dealing
        with the complex relationships among the aristocratic Catholic family
        that Charles Ryder is drawn into.  The Catholicism of the Flyte
        family is essential to the plot.  (How often do we get to hear the Salve
        Regina in a movie?)  Charles, a self-professed atheist, looks
        upon the Catholicism with the same mixture of fascination and repulsion
        that the media displayed toward the Fundamentalist Mormon compound in
        West Texas was earlier this year.   
       Charles, raised in a modest home by a distant, widowed father, goes
        to Oxford in the 1920’s, where he soon meets Sebastian Flyte and
        his homosexual friends.  Charles is taken in by the flamboyant Sebastian,
        and soon we find them frolicking and swimming together.  On a summer
        holiday, Charles also makes the acquaintance of other members of Sebastian’s
        family, including his sister Julia, his mother, the very religious Lady
        Marcham, and his father, Lord Marcham, who lives with a woman in Venice.  Charles’ relationship
        with Sebastian is strained by his attraction to Julia, as well as by
        Sebastian’s increasing abuse of alcohol.   
      Charles views the Flyte family this from his position as an outsider
        looking in.  Charles covets their extravagant lifestyle and allows
        himself to become entangled in the complex family relationships.  Charles
        is attracted to both Sebastian and Julia.  He loves the freedom
        of Lord Marcham’s Mediterranean lifestyle   Yet Charles
        also allows Lady Marcham to convince him to watch out for Sebastian,
        whose drinking has become problematic.  Sebastian accuses Charles
        of being on Lady Marcham’s side.  When Charles denies this,
        Sebastian retorts, “That’s the trouble with you, Charles.   You’re
        not on anyone’s side!”   Wanting to be on everyone’s
        side, Charles eventually ends up alienated from all. 
      At one point I thought that the current film was going to end up ridiculing
        Catholicism.  I do think there is an aspect of ridicule.  However,
        I think that has more to do with the early 20th Century setting, and
        Waugh’s experience being very much a part of a minority religion.  Certainly,
        Catholicism is seen as an oddity, with its strange rituals and beliefs.   Yes,
        Lady Marcham is rigid in her belief, dividing the world into those who
        are and are not Catholic.  She uses guilt to attempt to control
        Sebastian’s excesses.  Yet, it is precisely their Catholic
        faith that gives a dysfunctional family something to cling to and believe
        in.  In sharp contrast, Charles has nothing.  On his deathbed,
        Lord Marcham repents for his sins and makes the sign of the cross. This
        action amazes Charles who assumed Lord Marcham had, like him, seen Catholicism
        as nothing but superstition.    Then Charles expects Julia
        to criticize her father’s return to faith.  Far from it; she
        kneels and prays at his bedside.  Julia tells Charles that she will
        not be separated from God’s mercy.   All the members of the
        family return to their faith in some way. 
      The cast is large, and uneven.  Among the principal characters,
        Hayley Atwell gives the best performance as Julia, conflicted by family
        and marriage.  Veteran Michael Gambon is also very good in the smaller
        role of Lord Marcham.  Even though she is one of the great actresses
        working today, I wasn’t convinced by Emma Thompson as Lady Marcham.  She
        looks wrong for the matriarch, too young, despite the efforts of makeup
        artist to make her seem older.          
      So, while not totally successful, I found Brideshead Revisited beautiful
        to look at and fascinating to reflect on.   Certainly there’s
        a lot more to ponder here than in almost all other fare during this parched
        summer season. 
      Tom Condon, OP  |