The Reader
Early in the The Reader, set in Berlin
in 1958, 15 year old schoolboy Michael becomes ill on a streetcar,
gets off and wanders into an alley. Hannah, a woman in her 30s, going to her small flat from
her job as a streetcar conductor, stops briefly to care for him. When
he is well enough, Michael returns to thank Hannah, and they end up having
a brief, but torrid affair. (A note of caution: there is
nudity in these scenes.) Hannah frequently asks Michael to read
to her, which she enjoys very much. One day Michael goes
to the flat to find that Hannah has left. He is devastated, assuming
he will never see her again.
Eight years pass. Michael is now a law student. His class
visits a courtroom, where wo men are on trial for being concentration
camp guards during the War. Michael is astonished to see Hannah
standing as one of the accused women. Not only is she one of the
group, she is accused of being the leader of guards which allowed a group
of 500 Jewish women to die in a fire, rather than risk an escape. Could
this really be true of the woman whom he had loved?
The Reader is a fascinating film, with
rich, complex, morally ambiguous characters. The story is told through Michael’s
eyes, as he ages from a schoolboy to an adult. However, Hannah
is the pivotal character. Hannah haunts Michael throughout his
life. In most movies, the characters are immediately recognized
as “good” or “heroic” on the one hand, or “evil” on
the other. Hannah and Michael cannot be easily labeled. Michael
is scarred by his relationship with Hannah. He cares for her, yet
cannot bring himself to speak to her during the trial, and even withholds
important information. It’s easy to dislike Hannah, who seems
devoid of all emotion. Only briefly with Michael does she seem
happy. Hannah shows no remorse for the terrible crimes for which
she is accused. However, in the course of the film, we do find
out information about Hannah which may temper our feelings toward her. Can
one feel sympathy for a concentration camp guard? Or a woman
who enters into a sexual relationship with a minor?
These questions lingered as I left the theater. I admire the filmmakers
(director Stephen Daldry and screenwriter David Hare, adapting the novel
by Bernhard Schlink) for not telling me what to think of these characters. Michael
and Hannah are deeply wounded characters who have sinned and have been
sinned against. Yet there is still something about them that kept
me caring for them. As much as Michael wants to, he cannot stop
caring about Hannah. And neither could I. They are like people
I’ve met in my many years of ministry.
Kate Winslet has been winning awards for her portrayal
of Hannah, and is now deservedly nominated for an Oscar. She gives a great performance. Hannah
is a woman of few words. Winslet conveys her thoughts by her tight
posture and deep eyes, staring forward at the trial, making contact with
no one. Is she a cold-hearted mass murderer, or a victim, or both? David
Kross as young Michael also deserves credit for his sensitive performance. The
great actor Ralph Fiennes plays Michael as an adult. As good as
the cast is, it’s Kate Winslet that I will remember. I know
her performance as Hannah will haunt me for a long time.
Tom Condon, OP
|
Best Actress:
Kate Winslet
USCCB classifications:
(United States Conference of Catholic Bishops) is not available for this
film. |